![]() Diplomacy won’t work with ISIS because they are ideologically committed to attacking the West and we are never going to making concessions to ISIS, allowing them, for example, to control a certain amount of territory they’ve conquered. For example, diplomacy is not working now to resolve Russian hacking, Russian aggression in the Ukraine, or Chinese aggression in the South China Sea. (a) Con teams are never able to produce evidence that says diplomacy can resolve specific scenarios Pro teams read. This is most likely because it is strategic – Con teams can argue that diplomacy can be used to solve any impacts the Pro reads to why defense spending is good, while also arguing the Pro undermines the diplomatic approach.īut despite its popularity and strategic value, there argument has a number of weaknesses 1 - There is no solvency for the status quo All Public Forum Resources Millennial Speech & Debate Institutes As I discussed in my review of Blake arguments, the Diplomacy Good argument was very popular on the Con.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |